PARTNER

IMPACT

As of the Summer of 2018 over 38,450 students in 16 states, and 4 countrieshave learned key concepts in environmental stewardship and sustainability and have been empowered to take personal responsibility for their natural world. Learn more about our impact HERE.

 Power2Sustain believes in the power of collaboration to help our next generation succeed. We welcome you and/or your organization  to join us and help K-12th grade students become environmentally literate and active citizens and let your customers and community know your pledge to support the next generation's sustainability education. Please click HERE to learn about partnering opportunities. ​

SIGN-UP

FREE to teachers, principals, parents and and schools!

 

          Sign-up HERE

Keep in touch

© 2013-2018 Power2Sustain  is a registered 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization. Our Federal Tax ID number is: 80-0526319. All rights reserved.

SB270 – The California Bag Ban: Part I

January 20, 2015

by Taylor S. McLoughlin

 

Senate Bill 270 (SB270), signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September of 2014, is slated to go into effect July 1, 2015. The landmark legislation would require consumers to use reusable bags at grocery stores or purchase paper bags for 10 cents each.

 

However, SB270’s likelihood of going into full effect July 1 of 2015 is looking less and less likely. Following the September signing of the bill, a plastic bag manufacturing trade group called American Progressive Bag Alliance (APBA) immediately began a campaign to garner enough support to halt the bill.

 

According to Jeremy White of The Sacramento Bee, the APBA had a 90-day window of opportunity to obtain the 504,760 required signatures to block SB270. How many signatures did the association get? By December the APBA amassed a whopping 800,000+ signatures (pending confirmation of validity), more than enough to push SB270 to the November 2016 ballot where Californian voters will weigh in.

 

According to The Associated Press, the APBA spent an estimated $3.1 million on the effort, with over 98 percent of the funds coming from out of state sources. While that may seem like a lot of money, and it is, it pales in comparison to how much money the industry was projected to lose if the statewide ban is enacted. Reid Wilson of The Washington Post estimates the industry could lose out on $100 million from the prohibition on plastic bags.   

 

Despite strong opposition to SB270, over 100 cities and counties in California have implemented their own city ordinances that act identically to the bill. Judging by the numerous cities and counties already enforcing some sort of ban on single-use plastic bags it’s clear that Californians (at least those that didn’t sign the petition) are forward thinking and generally concerned with environmental politics.

 

Some may wonder then why it matters if SB270 succeeds or not, since many cities already have bans in place. In Part II I will dig deeper into the various consequences, both positive and negative, of the bill. 

Please reload

Featured Posts

by Taylor S. McLoughlin

 

Senate Bill 270 (SB270), signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September of 2014, is slated to go into effect July 1, 2015. The la...

SB270 – The California Bag Ban: Part I

January 20, 2015

1/1
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square